Heuristic Evaluation Identifies Minor Usability Issues in Academic Information System

Category: User-Centred Design · Effect: Moderate effect · Year: 2022

Expert review using Nielsen's heuristics can pinpoint minor usability flaws in academic information systems, guiding targeted improvements.

Design Takeaway

Prioritize consistency in UI elements and provide clear feedback mechanisms to prevent minor user errors and enhance overall system usability.

Why It Matters

Understanding and addressing usability issues is crucial for the adoption and effectiveness of digital platforms. By employing heuristic evaluation, design teams can proactively identify potential user frustrations and areas for enhancement before they impact a broader user base.

Key Finding

The expert review found no critical usability problems, but did identify several minor issues related to consistency, error prevention, and user support, suggesting specific areas for refinement.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: To evaluate the usability of the SIAK-NG academic information system using heuristic evaluation based on Jakob Nielsen's 10 usability principles.

Method: Heuristic Evaluation

Procedure: Three HCI and UI design experts evaluated the SIAK-NG system using a form based on Nielsen's 10 heuristic principles. They assessed severity rates for identified issues, and recommendations for improvement were derived from these ratings and HCI theory. Wireframes were created to suggest design revisions.

Sample Size: 3 expert evaluators

Context: Academic Information System (SIAK-NG)

Design Principle

Regularly apply heuristic evaluation with expert reviewers to identify and rectify usability issues early in the design process.

How to Apply

Conduct heuristic evaluations with 3-5 usability experts on your digital product, focusing on Nielsen's 10 heuristics, and use the severity ratings to prioritize fixes.

Limitations

The evaluation was conducted by a small number of expert evaluators, and did not involve direct end-user testing.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: Experts looked at a student information system and found a few small things that could be made easier for students to use, like making sure buttons and labels are always the same.

Why This Matters: This research shows how using expert opinions can help find problems in a digital system before real users get frustrated, which is a key part of making user-friendly designs.

Critical Thinking: How might the findings differ if the heuristic evaluation was supplemented with actual user testing? What are the trade-offs between expert evaluation and user testing?

IA-Ready Paragraph: This research demonstrates the effectiveness of heuristic evaluation in identifying usability issues within academic information systems. By employing expert reviewers against established principles, minor but impactful flaws in areas such as consistency and error prevention were pinpointed, leading to actionable design recommendations.

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Nielsen's 10 Heuristic Principles

Dependent Variable: Severity rate of usability issues

Controlled Variables: The specific academic information system being evaluated (SIAK-NG)

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Usability Testing pada Sistem Informasi Akademik New Generation (SIAK-NG) Undiksha Menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation Ditinjau dari Pengguna Mahasiswa · INSERT · 2022 · 10.23887/insert.v3i1.43173