Marketing Mix (5Ps) effectiveness in higher education institutions

Category: Innovation & Markets · Effect: Moderate effect · Year: 2022

A Goal-Oriented Evaluation Model reveals that while product, place, and promotion strategies in higher education are generally well-defined, pricing and people-centric strategies lack clear objectives and measurement techniques.

Design Takeaway

Designers and marketers in education must ensure that pricing and people-focused strategies are as clearly defined and measurable as product, place, and promotion strategies.

Why It Matters

Understanding the effectiveness of marketing strategies is crucial for educational institutions to adapt to market demands and attract students. This research highlights specific areas where marketing efforts can be strengthened to improve overall institutional performance and student engagement.

Key Finding

While product, place, and promotion strategies are somewhat defined, higher education marketing efforts lack clear objectives and measurement for success, particularly in pricing and people-related strategies.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: To evaluate the marketing strategies of higher education institutions using the Goal-Oriented Evaluation Model and the 5P Marketing Mix (Product, Price, Place, People, Promotion).

Method: Descriptive analysis with a qualitative approach.

Procedure: Data was collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. The research analyzed the 5P Marketing Mix elements (product, price, place, people, promotion) to assess the clarity of objectives and the presence of measurement techniques for marketing success.

Context: Higher education marketing, specifically within faculties of education.

Design Principle

Marketing strategies in service-based industries require clearly defined objectives and quantifiable success metrics across all elements of the marketing mix.

How to Apply

When developing marketing plans for educational services, ensure that objectives for price and personnel are as rigorously defined and measured as those for the core offering, distribution, and communication.

Limitations

The study focused on a specific faculty within higher education, and findings may not be generalizable to all educational institutions or sectors.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: This study looked at how universities market themselves. It found that while they have good ideas about what they offer, where students can find them, and how they tell people about them, they aren't as clear about their pricing goals or how they plan to connect with people. They also need better ways to measure if their marketing is actually working.

Why This Matters: Understanding how to effectively market educational services is vital for attracting students and ensuring the institution's success. This research provides a framework for evaluating and improving these marketing efforts.

Critical Thinking: To what extent can the 5P framework be adapted to evaluate the marketing of non-profit organizations or public services where profit is not the primary objective?

IA-Ready Paragraph: This research evaluated the marketing strategies of higher education institutions using the Goal-Oriented Evaluation Model and the 5P Marketing Mix. Findings indicated that while product, place, and promotion objectives were generally clear, there was a deficiency in defining specific objectives and measurement techniques for price and people-related marketing aspects, hindering a comprehensive evaluation of marketing success.

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Marketing Mix elements (Product, Price, Place, People, Promotion) and the Goal-Oriented Evaluation Model.

Dependent Variable: Clarity of marketing objectives and the presence of measurement techniques for marketing success.

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Evaluasi Pemasaran Jasa Pendidikan Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Perguruan Tinggi · Mimbar Ilmu · 2022 · 10.23887/mi.v27i3.48792