Managerial selection of 19 circular economy indicators aids sustainable decision-making

Category: Sustainability · Effect: Moderate effect · Year: 2019

A structured evaluation of 19 circular economy indicators from a managerial viewpoint helps organizations choose metrics that best support their transition to sustainable practices.

Design Takeaway

When designing for circularity, select performance indicators that are both measurable and align with your organization's operational capabilities and strategic goals.

Why It Matters

Implementing circular economy principles requires robust performance measurement. By understanding the analytical and operational feasibility of various indicators, design teams and businesses can select tools that effectively track progress and inform strategic decisions towards sustainability.

Key Finding

A comprehensive review and expert evaluation identified 19 circular economy indicators, highlighting the importance of managerial insight in choosing metrics that are both analytically sound and operationally feasible for driving sustainable business practices.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: How can companies effectively select and utilize circular economy indicators to support managerial decision-making for sustainable development?

Method: Systematic Literature Review and Delphi Methodology

Procedure: Researchers conducted a systematic review to identify 19 circular economy indicators at the micro-level. These indicators were then assessed and compared using the Delphi methodology, evaluating their analytical potential, practical application, and organizational feasibility from a managerial perspective.

Context: Corporate sustainability and circular economy implementation

Design Principle

Measure what matters: Select circular economy metrics that are relevant, reliable, and actionable for your specific design and business context.

How to Apply

When initiating a design project focused on circular economy principles, conduct a preliminary assessment of available indicators and select a manageable set that can be effectively tracked throughout the product lifecycle.

Limitations

The study focuses on micro-level indicators and a managerial perspective, which may not encompass all aspects of circular economy implementation or stakeholder viewpoints.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: This study looked at different ways companies can measure if they are doing a good job with the 'circular economy' (like reusing materials instead of throwing them away). They found 19 ways to measure this and used expert opinions to figure out which ones are best for managers to use when making decisions.

Why This Matters: Understanding how to measure circularity is key to designing products and systems that are truly sustainable and can be adopted by businesses.

Critical Thinking: To what extent do the proposed indicators capture the full scope of circular economy principles, and are there potential biases in a purely managerial perspective?

IA-Ready Paragraph: This research highlights the importance of selecting appropriate circular economy indicators for effective sustainable development. By analyzing 19 micro-level indicators through a managerial lens, the study provides a framework for choosing metrics that are both analytically robust and operationally feasible, thereby supporting informed decision-making in transitioning towards a circular economy.

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Selection criteria for circular economy indicators (analytical opportunities, potential application, organizational/operational issues)

Dependent Variable: Suitability and usefulness of circular economy indicators for managerial decision-making

Controlled Variables: Level of analysis (micro-level), perspective (managerial)

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Circular economy in companies: an analysis of selected indicators from a managerial perspective · Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering · 2019 · 10.2478/mape-2019-0053