Circular Economy Strategies: Unexplored Business Models and Public Scheme Interactions

Category: Sustainability · Effect: Moderate effect · Year: 2025

Many circular economy business strategies, particularly those focused on product life extension and use extension, remain underexplored in game theory research, despite their potential for sustainability.

Design Takeaway

Focus innovation efforts on developing and understanding the viability of circular economy models like product-as-a-service and product life extension, as these are currently underserved areas with significant potential.

Why It Matters

Understanding the strategic interactions between emerging circular economy business models and existing public incentives is crucial for fostering widespread adoption. Identifying these research gaps allows for targeted development of policies and business strategies that can accelerate the transition to a circular economy.

Key Finding

Current research in circular economy and game theory heavily favors resource recovery strategies, leaving product life extension, use extension, and newer models like sharing platforms and PaaS largely unexamined in the context of public incentives.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: What are the unexplored intersections between circular economy business strategies and public schemes within game theory research?

Method: Literature Review and Game Theory Analysis

Procedure: The study surveyed existing game theory literature concerning circular economy business strategies and public schemes, categorizing strategies and public incentives to identify areas of limited research.

Context: Circular Economy Business Strategy and Public Policy

Design Principle

Prioritize research and development into circular economy business models that extend product life and promote service-based offerings, as these represent significant opportunities for sustainable innovation.

How to Apply

When developing new product or service concepts, consider how they can be designed for longevity, repairability, and eventual reintegration into material cycles, and investigate potential public support mechanisms.

Limitations

The analysis is based on existing game theory literature, which may not encompass all emerging circular economy strategies or public schemes.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: Many ways to make products circular are not well-studied, especially when considering how government help (like grants or taxes) works with business ideas like renting products instead of selling them, or making products last longer.

Why This Matters: Understanding which circular economy strategies are less explored helps identify opportunities for innovation and allows for more informed design decisions that can contribute to sustainability goals.

Critical Thinking: Given the under-exploration of certain CE strategies, what are the potential risks and rewards for businesses that pioneer these models, and how can public schemes be designed to mitigate risks and amplify rewards?

IA-Ready Paragraph: This research highlights that while resource recovery is a well-studied aspect of the circular economy within game theory, strategies such as product life extension, use extension, and product-as-a-service remain significantly underexplored. This gap presents an opportunity for design projects to investigate innovative business models and their interaction with public schemes, potentially leading to more effective and widespread adoption of circular practices.

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Circular Economy Business Strategies (e.g., resource recovery, product life extension, PaaS)

Dependent Variable: Level of research and investigation within game theory literature, interaction with public schemes

Controlled Variables: Public schemes (e.g., taxation, subsidies, EPR)

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Circular economy business strategies and public schemes: a game theory‐based survey · International Transactions in Operational Research · 2025 · 10.1111/itor.70031