Problem framing significantly impacts solution diversity and quality in open innovation challenges.

Category: Innovation & Design · Effect: Strong effect · Year: 2023

The way a technical problem is defined and presented in an open innovation context directly influences the range and caliber of solutions generated by participants.

Design Takeaway

When initiating an open innovation process, carefully consider how the problem is framed, as this will shape the pool of solvers and the nature of the solutions you receive.

Why It Matters

Understanding this relationship allows design teams to strategically frame challenges to elicit specific types of innovation, whether it's novel approaches, diverse solutions, or highly feasible designs. This can optimize the outcomes of crowdsourced design efforts and accelerate product development.

Key Finding

The study found that how a design problem is presented in an open innovation challenge affects who participates and the variety and quality of the solutions submitted.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: How does the architectural framing of a technical problem in an open innovation setting influence the characteristics of the solvers who engage and the attributes of the solutions they produce?

Method: Data analysis of an open innovation challenge dataset

Procedure: Researchers analyzed data from a large-scale open innovation challenge involving multiple contests, tracking potential solvers, their engagement, and the submitted solutions. They characterized the relationship between problem formulation, solver attributes, solving processes, and solution outcomes.

Sample Size: 16,249 potential solvers, 6,219 initiated solving, 147 unique solvers submitted 263 solutions.

Context: Open innovation platforms, engineering design challenges, robotic design.

Design Principle

Problem framing is a critical upstream variable in open innovation that dictates downstream solution diversity and quality.

How to Apply

When setting up a design challenge or seeking external innovation, spend time defining and refining the problem statement to guide participants towards desired outcomes.

Limitations

The specific context of a robotic design challenge might not generalize perfectly to all design domains. The dataset is specific to the 'Astrobee Challenge Series'.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: How you ask a design question in a competition can change the kinds of answers you get and who tries to answer it.

Why This Matters: This research shows that the way you set up a design challenge or ask for ideas can have a big impact on the results you get, helping you get better solutions for your design projects.

Critical Thinking: To what extent can problem framing be used to 'engineer' specific types of innovation, and what are the ethical considerations of such manipulation?

IA-Ready Paragraph: The 'Astrobee Challenge Series' data explainer (Szajnfarber et al., 2023) highlights that the architectural framing of a technical problem in an open innovation context is a significant determinant of solver engagement and solution attributes. This suggests that design practitioners should carefully consider how problem statements are formulated to elicit desired innovation outcomes, such as novelty or diversity.

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Problem framing (e.g., architectural manipulation of the problem)

Dependent Variable: Solver characteristics (demographics, expertise), solving processes, solution attributes (novelty, variety, feasibility)

Controlled Variables: Open innovation platform, duration of contests, general problem domain (robotics).

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Linking solver characteristics, solving processes and solution attributes: A data explainer for an open innovation generated robotic design dataset · Data in Brief · 2023 · 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109547