Evolutionary Framework for Circular EV Battery Supply Chains

Category: Sustainability · Effect: Strong effect · Year: 2023

Adopting an evolutionary perspective is crucial for strategically configuring closed-loop supply chains (CLSC) during the transition to a circular economy, particularly for complex products like EV batteries.

Design Takeaway

Design projects focused on circularity must incorporate an evolutionary mindset, planning for adaptation and co-development of systems, products, and infrastructure over time.

Why It Matters

This research highlights that the development of circular supply chains is not a static process but an ongoing evolution. Understanding these dynamics allows designers and supply chain managers to anticipate challenges, foster necessary collaborations, and adapt strategies as technologies and markets mature.

Key Finding

Developing circular supply chains for EV batteries is a dynamic, evolutionary process that necessitates integrated development of technology, product, and infrastructure, supported by strong stakeholder relationships, while navigating market and technological uncertainties.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: To develop and apply an evolutionary analytical framework for understanding the strategic configuration of closed-loop supply chains in the context of the transition to a circular economy for EV batteries.

Method: Exploratory case study

Procedure: An evolutionary analytical framework was developed and applied to investigate the dynamics of four closed-loop supply chain configurations and ten potential trajectories within a leading European heavy vehicle manufacturer over two years.

Context: Electric vehicle (EV) battery supply chains and the transition to a circular economy.

Design Principle

Circular supply chains must be designed with an evolutionary perspective, anticipating and adapting to technological, market, and infrastructural changes.

How to Apply

When designing or redesigning a product system for circularity, map out potential evolutionary pathways for its supply chain and identify key dependencies and co-development needs.

Limitations

The proposed framework offers a single-actor perspective and does not directly address the dynamics and effects of actions taken by other supply chain actors.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: Think of building a circular supply chain like growing a plant: it needs the right conditions, constant care, and it changes over time. You can't just set it up and expect it to work perfectly forever, especially for complex things like electric car batteries.

Why This Matters: Understanding that circular systems evolve helps you design more resilient and future-proof solutions. It moves beyond a one-time design fix to a dynamic approach that accounts for real-world changes.

Critical Thinking: How can designers proactively build flexibility and adaptability into product and supply chain designs to accommodate unforeseen evolutionary pathways?

IA-Ready Paragraph: The transition to a circular economy for products like EV batteries necessitates an evolutionary approach to supply chain configuration. Research indicates that successful closed-loop systems require the co-development of technologies, product design, and infrastructure, fostered through long-term stakeholder relationships, while actively managing uncertainties inherent in market and technological evolution (Chizaryfard et al., 2023).

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Evolutionary perspective in strategic configuration of CLSC

Dependent Variable: Effectiveness and challenges of CLSC development in the transition to a circular economy

Controlled Variables: Product type (EV batteries), Industry context (heavy vehicle manufacturing)

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Strategic closed-loop supply chain configuration in the transition towards the circular economy of EV batteries: an evolutionary analytical framework · The International Journal of Logistics Management · 2023 · 10.1108/ijlm-06-2021-0337