Tracking Scientific Software Impact Through Online Mentions

Category: Innovation & Design · Effect: Moderate effect · Year: 2021

Analyzing online mentions of scientific software across academic literature, webpages, and social media provides a comprehensive understanding of its impact and usage.

Design Takeaway

Incorporate webometric analysis into the evaluation of scientific software to understand its multifaceted impact beyond traditional academic citations.

Why It Matters

Understanding how scientific software is discussed and referenced online is crucial for developers and researchers to gauge its adoption, identify areas of interest, and inform future development. This approach offers a novel way to assess the broader influence of digital tools beyond traditional citation metrics.

Key Finding

By examining where and how scientific software is mentioned online, researchers can differentiate between its use in academic work and broader public or informational interest.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: How can a link-based webometric approach be used to characterize the online mentions and impact of scientific software across different analytical frameworks?

Method: Webometric analysis

Procedure: The study used VOSviewer's official website as a baseline and counted online mentions across three frameworks: academic literature (Google Scholar), general webpages (Majestic), and social media (Twitter). The number of mentions in each framework was recorded and analyzed to understand different facets of software impact.

Sample Size: Google Scholar: 988 publications, Majestic: 1,330 websites, Twitter: 267 tweets

Context: Scientific software usage and impact assessment

Design Principle

Assess the digital footprint of designed tools to understand their real-world influence and user engagement.

How to Apply

For a new scientific tool, track its mentions on academic databases, relevant forums, and social media to build a comprehensive impact profile.

Limitations

The study's findings are specific to the VOSviewer software and the chosen analytical frameworks; generalizability to all scientific software may vary. The interpretation of 'mentions' can be subjective and may not always directly correlate with deep usage or impact.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: This research shows that you can learn how much people are using and talking about scientific software by looking at where its website is linked online – in research papers, on other websites, and on social media.

Why This Matters: Understanding how software is discussed online helps designers see its real-world value and how it fits into the broader scientific community, which is important for making informed design decisions.

Critical Thinking: How might the 'conversational' aspect of social media mentions differ in its value compared to academic literature mentions when assessing software utility?

IA-Ready Paragraph: The study by Orduña‐Malea and Costas (2021) highlights the utility of webometric analysis in understanding the impact of scientific software. By examining online mentions across academic literature, general webpages, and social media, it's possible to gain a more comprehensive view of a tool's adoption and influence, moving beyond traditional citation metrics.

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Analytical framework (academic literature, webpages, tweets)

Dependent Variable: Number of online mentions (links)

Controlled Variables: Baseline website (VOSviewer official website)

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Link-based approach to study scientific software usage: the case of VOSviewer · Scientometrics · 2021 · 10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y