Sketching, CAD, Cardboard, and LEGO reveal distinct design process affordances

Category: Modelling · Effect: Moderate effect · Year: 2018

Different prototyping materials and methods inherently support and limit specific design activities, influencing the types of questions designers can effectively explore.

Design Takeaway

Select your prototyping tools strategically based on what you need to learn at each stage of the design process.

Why It Matters

Understanding these affordances allows design teams to select the most appropriate prototyping techniques for different stages of product development. This strategic choice can accelerate problem-solving, uncover critical insights, and lead to more robust and user-centred solutions.

Key Finding

The study found that sketching is best for initial ideas, CAD for detailed refinement, and physical materials like cardboard and LEGO for exploring form and basic function, with each method influencing the design process differently.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: To characterize and compare the affordances and limitations of common prototyping techniques (sketching, CAD, cardboard, LEGO) in supporting early-stage product development activities.

Method: Comparative study

Procedure: A literature review was conducted to understand existing research on prototype characterization. Subsequently, a group design task was performed where participants used sketching, CAD, cardboard, and LEGO as prototyping methods. The study then analyzed the differences in design activities facilitated by each technique.

Context: Early-stage product development and design processes

Design Principle

The affordances of a prototyping medium dictate the nature of design exploration it can support.

How to Apply

When initiating a new design project, consider mapping out the key questions you need to answer and then select prototyping methods that are best suited to address those specific questions.

Limitations

The study's findings may be specific to the particular design task and participant group used. The comparison focused on a limited set of prototyping techniques.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: Different ways of making models (like drawing, using computer software, or building with cardboard/LEGO) help you discover different things about your design idea.

Why This Matters: Understanding how different models help you explore ideas is crucial for making good design decisions and showing your design process effectively.

Critical Thinking: How might the 'learning curve' associated with a particular prototyping tool (e.g., CAD software) influence its perceived affordances in early-stage design, potentially favouring more familiar methods?

IA-Ready Paragraph: The selection of prototyping techniques significantly influences the design process, with different methods offering distinct affordances for exploration. As demonstrated by Mathias et al. (2018), sketching is effective for initial ideation, CAD for detailed refinement, and physical models like cardboard or LEGO for tangible form exploration. Therefore, choosing prototyping methods aligned with specific design questions is essential for effective product development.

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Type of prototyping technique (sketching, CAD, cardboard, LEGO)

Dependent Variable: Levels and types of design activities (e.g., idea generation, form exploration, functional testing, problem-solving)

Controlled Variables: Group size, design task, time allocated for prototyping

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

CHARACTERISING THE AFFORDANCES AND LIMITATIONS OF COMMON PROTOTYPING TECHNIQUES TO SUPPORT THE EARLY STAGES OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · Proceedings of the ... International Design Conference/Design ... · 2018 · 10.21278/idc.2018.0445