Accessibility in Open Educational Resources is Nascent, Requiring Focus on Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust Design Principles

Category: User-Centred Design · Effect: Moderate effect · Year: 2020

Current open educational resources (OER) and practices (OEP) are not adequately designed for disabled learners, indicating a significant gap in accessibility that requires a deliberate application of established accessibility principles.

Design Takeaway

Designers of educational materials must proactively incorporate the principles of perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust design to ensure equitable access for all learners, particularly those with disabilities.

Why It Matters

Designers and developers creating educational content must recognize that a substantial and growing population of learners has diverse needs. Failing to integrate accessibility from the outset leads to exclusion and can result in learners disengaging from educational opportunities. Proactive design ensures inclusivity and maximizes the reach and impact of educational materials.

Key Finding

The review found that open educational resources are not yet fully accessible to disabled learners, and designers need to more consistently apply principles like making content perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust. The use of assistive technologies with these resources also needs more attention.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: To systematically review existing research on accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners and identify key areas for improvement.

Method: Systematic Literature Review

Procedure: A systematic review was conducted on 31 research papers to synthesize current understanding of accessibility within OER and OEP for students with functional diversity.

Sample Size: 31 papers

Context: Educational Technology and Open Educational Resources

Design Principle

Design for accessibility by adhering to the POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust) to ensure inclusivity for diverse user needs.

How to Apply

When designing any digital educational content, conduct an accessibility audit against the POUR principles and research how assistive technologies can be integrated.

Limitations

The review highlights that the research landscape itself is limited, suggesting that the findings are based on a nascent body of work and may not capture all nuances of the problem.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: Making online learning materials easy to see, use, understand, and compatible with different tools is important for everyone, especially students with disabilities, but current online learning materials aren't doing this well enough.

Why This Matters: Ensuring your design project is accessible means more people can use it, which is a key goal in user-centred design and makes your project more successful and ethical.

Critical Thinking: To what extent do current design tools and platforms inherently support or hinder the creation of accessible educational resources, and what responsibility do designers have to overcome these limitations?

IA-Ready Paragraph: This research highlights that accessibility within digital educational resources is still developing, with a critical need to integrate the POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust) to better support disabled learners. My design project aims to address this by [briefly state how your project addresses accessibility].

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Design features of OER/OEP (e.g., use of multimedia, navigation structure, content format)

Dependent Variable: Accessibility for disabled learners (measured by usability, e-inclusion, user satisfaction)

Controlled Variables: Type of educational institution, subject matter of OER, specific disability group being considered.

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners: a systematic literature review · Smart Learning Environments · 2020 · 10.1186/s40561-019-0113-2