Digital Twins Optimize Bridge Decommissioning for Circular Economy

Category: Sustainability · Effect: Strong effect · Year: 2025

Integrating digital twin technology with Building Information Modeling (BIM) allows for strategic demolition planning that quantifies lifecycle costs and carbon footprints, thereby enhancing circular economy practices for bridge infrastructure.

Design Takeaway

Incorporate digital twin and BIM capabilities into infrastructure projects to proactively plan for sustainable decommissioning and material circularity, rather than treating it as an afterthought.

Why It Matters

This approach moves beyond traditional end-of-life considerations by proactively planning for material reuse, repurposing, and recycling. It provides designers and asset managers with critical data to make informed decisions that minimize environmental impact and maximize resource value throughout an infrastructure's entire lifecycle.

Key Finding

The research found that the initial construction phase of bridges generates the most significant carbon emissions and costs. Therefore, a well-planned demolition strategy, enabled by digital twin technology, is essential to effectively manage waste and promote the reuse and recycling of materials, aligning with circular economy principles.

Key Findings

Research Evidence

Aim: How can digital twin technology, driven by BIM data, be utilized to develop strategic demolition plans that optimize both lifecycle cost and carbon footprint for bridge infrastructure, thereby promoting circular asset management?

Method: Simulation and Modelling

Procedure: A three-dimensional BIM model incorporating time, cost, and carbon emission data was created for a bridge infrastructure. This model was then used to drive a digital twin that simulated various demolition scenarios. The lifecycle cost and carbon footprint of each scenario were quantified and optimized to identify the most sustainable end-of-life strategy.

Context: Infrastructure asset management, specifically bridge decommissioning.

Design Principle

Design for Disassembly and Material Circularity: Plan for the end-of-life phase during the initial design to facilitate material recovery, reuse, and recycling.

How to Apply

When planning for the end-of-life of any significant built asset, utilize digital twin technology to simulate and analyze various demolition and material recovery strategies, prioritizing those that maximize circularity and minimize environmental impact.

Limitations

The study focused on a specific bridge infrastructure; generalizability to other types of infrastructure may vary. The accuracy of the digital twin is dependent on the quality and completeness of the BIM data.

Student Guide (IB Design Technology)

Simple Explanation: Imagine a digital copy of a bridge that can show you the best way to take it apart at the end of its life to reuse its materials and reduce waste.

Why This Matters: This research shows how we can be smarter about building and then taking things apart, making sure we don't waste resources and harm the environment.

Critical Thinking: How can the principles of strategic demolition planning and digital twin integration be applied to smaller-scale products to promote a more circular economy?

IA-Ready Paragraph: This research highlights the critical role of digital twin technology, integrated with BIM, in enabling strategic demolition planning for bridge infrastructures. By quantifying lifecycle costs and carbon footprints, such approaches facilitate enhanced circular asset management, moving towards carbon neutrality and maximizing material reuse, repurposing, and recycling at the end of an asset's life.

Project Tips

How to Use in IA

Examiner Tips

Independent Variable: Digital twin-driven demolition scenarios

Dependent Variable: Lifecycle cost and carbon footprint

Controlled Variables: Bridge infrastructure characteristics, BIM data quality

Strengths

Critical Questions

Extended Essay Application

Source

Digital twin-driven strategic demolition plan for circular asset management of bridge infrastructures · Scientific Reports · 2025 · 10.1038/s41598-025-94117-8